×

PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE

  • Not choosing a modern method despite its availability could be construed as negligence

    - Supreme Court | MLCD October 2024

  • Primary doctor rejecting the opinion of the consultant is not always negligence

    - National Consumer Commission | MLCD October 2024

  • Refusal to meet non-emergency patients / attendants without a prior appointment in OPD is not negligence

    - Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | MLCD October 2024

  • Failure to follow an international protocol missing in Indian guidelines is not negligence

    - National Consumer Commission | MLCD October 2024

Just Published | October 2024

Why did the doctor not choose a modern method despite its availability questions Supreme Court

Najrul Seikh v/s Dr. Sumit Banerjee & Anr.
17MLCD (j397) | Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: Patient


Treating doctor can accept or reject the opinion of a consultant regarding the line of treatment holds court

Usha Nanda v/s Sanjiban Hospital Authority & Ors.
17MLCD (j400) | National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: Doctor


Refusal to meet non-emergency patients / attendants without a prior appointment in OPD is justified holds court

Sangeeta Rajendra Sharma & Anr. v/s P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Center & Anr.
17MLCD (j403) | Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai
Judgement in favour of: Doctor


Infant suffers from jaundice due to G6PD deficiency – Court exonerates doctor as the Indian protocol does not endorse screening neonates for G6PD deficiency

Master Neil Mendonsa (Minor) & Ors. v/s Dr. Egbert Saldanha & Ors.
17MLCD (j409) | National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi
Judgement in favour of: Doctor


Most Popular



Know Your Journal

How To Get Maximum
    From the Editors Desk
  • Handing Over The Baton – Welcome Dr. Shreekant Shetty, our new Editor

    Read
  • What are the changes that have happened in your journal?

    Read
  • We want you to be acquainted with both sides of the coin

    Read
  • How is this journal made?

    Read
  • How to get the maximum out of this journal

    Read
  • Is this journal the need of the hour?

    Read
  • The First Editorial

    Read

  • Publishes ‘real time judgments’ on medical negligence from higher courts
  • Every judgment is further summarized in simple, non-legal language
  • Comprehensively guides a doctor on avoiding MedLegal issues
  • Suggests practically useful ‘Do’s & Don’ts’ in day-to-day practice
  • Cases selected / analyzed solely from a doctor’s viewpoint
Testimonials FAQs Get Complimentary Copy